Quality Assurance for Precise Talent Evaluations

Implementation Planning & Support

Axeligence | Service Details

Play Video about Axeligence Quality Assurance


Organizations rely on performance reviews, skills assessments, 360 feedback, and other talent evaluation tools to make critical workforce decisions. But without proper oversight, these methods risk inconsistencies, bias, non-compliance, and outright invalidity. Employees may feel reviews are arbitrary and unfair, hurting engagement.

Our quality assurance services tackle these challenges through a comprehensive analysis of your existing processes. We identify opportunities to make evaluations more fair, accurate, consistent, legally compliant, and predictive of performance. You receive data-driven recommendations tailored to your organization’s needs and goals.

Ultimately, we help ensure your methods reliably assess skills, aptitudes, behaviors, and achievements. This provides confidence in people data guiding hiring, promotion, development, compensation, and other key decisions. Employees gain trust the processes are equitable and ratings objective.


Optimizing evaluation methods through quality assurance provides multifaceted benefits:



  • Minimizes biases that influence ratings, ensuring equitable treatment.

  • Builds trust that ratings reflect actual performance, not relationships/politics.

  • Employees feel evaluations are fair regardless of background.



  • Performance appraisals better capture contributions made.

  • Skills assessments precisely gauge competencies needed to excel.

  • Subjective impressions get counterbalanced with objective inputs.



  • Standardized rating scales, criteria, and processes across the organization.

  • Rater training minimizes individual judgement and ensures alignment.

  • Disparate scoring patterns get corrected.



  • Methods comply fully with EEOC, ADA, Uniform Guidelines, and other regulations.

  • Risk of litigation related to promotions, compensation, termination is reduced.


Strategic Workforce Planning

  • Flawed data gets corrected, enabling smarter talent decisions.

  • Resources optimally allocated to retain top talent and develop high potentials.

  • Greater confidence in performance ratings used for rewards, promotions, layoffs.


Ultimately, quality assurance leads to credible evaluation practices that benefit both the organization and employees.

Service Details

Below we delve deeper into the components of our service:


1. Evaluation Method Review

First, we conduct an extensive review of all existing evaluation policies, procedures, tools, and systems. This includes:

  • Performance Management – Appraisal process, rating scales, criteria, rater training

  • Skills Assessments – Tests, simulations, work samples, assessment administration

  • Interview Practices – Panel structures, question types, rating rubrics, standardization

  • Competency Models – Framework, definitions, measurement approaches

  • 360 Assessments – Survey design, rater selection, delivery, analysis

  • Other Criteria – Promotion requirements, bonus allocation formulas, etc.


We thoroughly examine relevant documentation and administration processes. Interviews provide additional context on strengths/weaknesses.

This deep dive enables us to pinpoint improvement opportunities.


2. Compliance Audit

Your evaluation methods get audited for compliance with regulations including:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

  • Age Discrimination in Employment Act

  • Americans with Disabilities Act

  • Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures


We check that:

  • Rating criteria do not unfairly disadvantage certain groups

  • Assessments accommodate disabilities as required

  • Selection procedures demonstrate job relevance without unjustified adverse impact


This minimizes legal risks.


3. Historical Data Analysis

Leveraging your existing evaluation data, we analyze for indicators of inconsistency, bias, or other issues. Statistics illuminate areas like:

  • Variations in scoring patterns across business units, roles, or rater groups

  • Group differences in ratings correlated to gender, ethnicity, age, or other factors

  • Low inter-rater reliability on subjective assessments

  • Poor relationships between ratings and actual performance


Analyzing historical patterns enables us to pinpoint where enhancements can have maximum impact.


4. Improvement Recommendations

Considering the insights uncovered through the evaluation, compliance audit, and data analysis, we will develop a set of prioritized recommendations customized to your needs.

Examples may include:

  • Introducing rater calibration training to increase consistency

  • Revising rating scales prone to inflation or contrast biases

  • Updating competency models to better reflect abilities critical for success

  • Weighting performance dimensions based on job analysis findings

  • Adding structured interviews to balance subjective judgments

  • Enhancing multi-rater survey design to increase reliability and limit bias

  • Simplifying protocols to reduce administration errors or omissions


For every recommendation, we provide guidance on how to implement for optimal fairness, accuracy, standardization, validity, and lower legal risk.


5. Implementation Planning & Support

Optionally, we can partner with you to implement recommendations through activities like:

  • Detailed project planning and scheduling

  • Constructing updated processes, tools, rater training

  • Ongoing change management and communications

  • Progress monitoring and troubleshooting


We advise your team until the solutions are rolled out and quality assurance practices firmly ingrained.

In summary, our 5-step approach ensures an objective evaluation paired with achievable enhancements.

The Process

Below outlines how we typically partner with organizations from start to finish:


Step 1: Planning & Scoping

We begin with in-depth planning discussions to:

  • Clarify objectives

  • Detail your current evaluation processes

  • Identify pain points

  • Review logistics (stakeholder access, timeframes, documentation needs)


This enables us to focus our efforts for maximum relevance.


Step 2: Evaluation & Analysis

Our team then performs the evaluation method review, compliance audit, and historical data analysis. We compile detailed findings and begin formulating recommendations. Frequent check-ins provide open communication.


Step 3: Insights Presentation

We provide a presentation of prioritized recommendations to enhance fairness, consistency, accuracy, validity, and legal defensibility. Annotated examples illustrate potential solutions suited to your needs.


Step 4: Implementation Roadmap

For organizations pursuing enhancements, we create a tailored implementation roadmap covering activities, timelines, resources, costs, and success metrics.


Step 5: Ongoing Support

As desired, we support rollout through project management, solution design, training, monitoring, and issue resolution. We ensure recommendations yield tangible improvements.

Throughout the engagement, we emphasize collaboration, clear deliverables, and sustainable value.


What evaluation methods do you review?

Our focus is personnel assessments used for talent decisions – performance appraisals, skills testing, multi-rater surveys, interview practices, promotion criteria, etc. We do not perform a full HR audit.

The evaluation and analysis typically takes 4-8 weeks. Implementation timeframes vary based on scope – from 2 months for targeted solutions up to a year for organization-wide transformation.

We’ll need documentation on all relevant evaluation processes, tools, policies, historical data, and personnel for interviews. Access to systems housing data is also ideal.

The main deliverables are an insights report with recommendations and an implementation roadmap if enhancements will be rolled out.

While we audit for compliance risks, we cannot provide legal opinions or officially certify compliance. You still need to involve your legal department.

We can flexibly provide as little or as much implementation guidance as desired – from just delivering recommendations to managing the full rollout.

Costs vary based on the scope of methods reviewed and extent of analysis and implementation support needed. We provide quotes tailored to your specific needs.

Based on results from past clients, you can expect to see increased consistency and reliability in ratings, reduced adverse impact, higher legal defensibility, and greater confidence in human capital decisions.

Let’s Discuss Your Quality Assurance Needs

Our team looks forward to learning about your talent assessment practices and discussing how we can help take them to the next level through quality assurance.

Speak to a Dedicated Specialist:

Your privacy is our top priority, we take serious measures to ensure the protection of the data you entrust to us.

Personal Risk Management Solutions for Any Crisis, Anywhere -Join Our Community:

Axeligence is headquartered in Israel and operates in more than 50 countries worldwide.

Our global presence allows us to provide local insights and intelligence in any market or environment.


Personal Risk Management Solutions for Any Crisis, Anywhere.

We’ve got your back when others just can’t.